One of the ways that I define maturity is being able to see from someone else’s perspective. But I’m not sure that ever happens. In communications, there’s this truism that you can’t experience a feeling that you don’t have a vocabulary to describe. I don’t quite buy that – I think there’s a lot that we live through that is beyond our words. However, I do think it’s virtually impossible to share that experience, and have others participate in a meaningful way in it if you can’t describe it. (Take that as a challenge to grow your vocabulary, not permission to give up the effort!)
Egocentrism is a developmental stage in children. It describes a period when a child is unable to comprehend anything beyond the self. It’s the young age where if a child can’t see a toy, it just ceases to exist. I kind of think that we never quite grow out of that. I’ve heard college professors argue for their chosen discipline to be the centre of existence: “Economics is everything!” I see it reinforced time and again with the people that I rub shoulders with. Each at some level views their own personalities and expectations as universal – whether saliently or subtly. We need to constantly, consistently and deeply question these assumptions. We do great violence in the world when we don’t. Even our most generous and noble actions are motivated in a way that is in a word, selfish. No matter how hard you try on your own, you just can’t escape it.
In his otherwise light-hearted song, People Should Smile More, Newton Faulkner sings the jarring lyric: “I can’t change the world / ‘Cause tryin’ to make a difference makes things worse.” I’ve mulled over that. It rings true. Because I don’t think we’re supposed to have the grandiose desire to change the world. If that is our desire, it can’t help but to be in effort make it match our own personalities. If the whole world looked like me, it would be running off in all directions and it’d be really bad at economics. (Wait, maybe it does look like me!)
No two people desire the exact same goal(s). And that’s okay. Honestly! Even in a company full of paid employees, or a church, or a social group, or an online community, or a marriage or whatever. It’s totally okay. Of course we need to manage how diverse we allow the end goals to be, and define the shape and scope of them together. If they’re totally incompatible, that will become pretty obvious, pretty quick. But a multiplicity of goals can co-exist coherently surprisingly well. That is, if they’re openly discussed, submitted to the greater good, and simply allowed to. You just need to know that you can’t see them right away, and can’t fully understand them, so you need to keep asking the important questions.
Your unique perspective is critically important. Just like everyone else’s.
Recent Comments